Buy:Zithromax.Soma.Cialis Soft Tabs.Viagra.Propecia.Cialis Professional.Maxaman.Cialis.Viagra Super Active+.Super Active ED Pack.Cialis Super Active+.Levitra.Viagra Soft Tabs.Viagra Super Force.Viagra Professional.VPXL.Tramadol….

Have you tried something like: http://delicious.com/search?p=tag%3Asubscriptio...

Delicious search isn't ranked by saves count either, but you might like the results better than tag intersections. I wrote a Perl script to test the difference between relevance and save counts ranking. Here are the top 10 results by save counts for your query:

22375 http://www.istockphoto.com/index.php
10126 http://37signals.com/
6521 http://www.campaignmonitor.com/
5248 http://www.shopify.com/
4930 https://www.paypal.com/
4476 http://www.mailchimp.com/
4208 http://online.wsj.com/public/us
3706 http://freekeywords.wordtracker.com/
3670 http://www.wordtracker.com/
2378 http://paidcontent.org/

I hope it helps.

@run4yourlives – You're my hero of the day. But that also kind of proves my point. I've been reading Hacker News for six months and only now do I know that exists. It seems like there needs to be a better way to let people know that this stuff is out there. Similarly, it took me a while to figure out how to do the delicious thing I referenced above.

@gordonmattey – Very, very cool. Will check out. I definitely think a metafilter would be better. However, as you state, the question is whether you could get all these companies to share data in a meaningful way. That's why my initial recommendation was for better filters within the various silos. I think your approach is more ideal but also more difficult to pull off.

We believe that one approach is to have all content providers start to publish anonymous behaviour information so that third party filters can do a better job than they can with things like tags. Whether those filters are bookmarking services, search engines, or domain specific recommendation engines, there are many potential consumers of such enhanced data.

If you step back for one second, wouldn't it be better if you had an engine that helped filter not just the NYT, but also the WSJ, or whatever set of online news sites you read?

The challenge of course is how and why you publish this metadata. Content providers have to decide that the connections this type of open sharing would create will lead to innovation and more demand for their content (assuming their content is good, of course the bad content would always be filtered).

Google has standardised what metadata is important based on pagerank etc. but the real questions is how do we start creating more useful metadata, in an open, authoritative way without leaving the system open to abuse. ala META tags of the 90's….